Translate to Englishתרגם לעברית/HebrewПревеждам към Българин/BulgarianPrevesti to Hrvatski/CroatianPřeložit do Čech/CzechOversætte hen til Dansk/DanishLefordít -hoz Magyar/Hungariantagapagsalin sa Filipino/FilipinoTłumaczyć wobec Polski/Polishtolmačiti v slovenski/SlovenianÖversätta till Svensk/Swedishtercüme etmek -e doğru Türk/Turkishहिन्दी अनुवाद करने के लिए/HindiOversetter til Norsk/NorwegianTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduzca al Español/SpanishTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/German日本語に翻訳しなさい /Japanese한국어에게 번역하십시오/KoreanTraduisez au Français/French中文翻译/Chinese Simplifiedترجمة الى العربية/ArabicVertaal aan het Nederlands/DutchПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/Greek

Bin Laden a Pirate?

August 30, 2006 by Anil P.  
Filed under Travel

I read this off of Bruce Scheiner’s blog today and I thought it was very interesting for those of you whole like legal, security, and pirate matters. It’s a little talk about how to classify terrorists, so we get rid of much of the ambiguity that exists in the US concerning their legal status, and how by classifying terrorists as pirates, other not-so-friendly states would be pressured to give them up.

That goes for you too Bert!

Read on, hope you find this interesting – and of course, thoughts are always welcome.

First, the crime of terrorism would be defined and proscribed internationally, and terrorists would be properly understood as enemies of all states. This legal status carries significant advantages, chief among them the possibility of universal jurisdiction. Terrorists, as hostis humani generis, could be captured wherever they were found, by anyone who found them. Pirates are currently the only form of criminals subject to this special jurisdiction.

Second, this definition would deter states from harboring terrorists on the grounds that they are “freedom fighters” by providing an objective distinction in law between legitimate insurgency and outright terrorism.

Third, and perhaps most important, nations that now balk at assisting the United States in the war on terror might have fewer reservations if terrorism were defined as an international crime that could be prosecuted before the International Criminal Court.

Full story here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • blogmarks
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Related posts:

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!